Media ignoring regional languages

Media ignoring regional languages

ISLAMABAD: Weakening editorial strength in print and electronic media has adversely impacted regional languages.

However, radio remains a bright light among modern media which allots at least 50 per cent of its air time to regional languages. These views were expressed by panellists at a session on the impact of media on mother languages on the second and last day of the Mother Languages Literature Festival at Lok Virsa on Sunday.

Hussain Naqi said that a language will be under threat if it is not read daily. For this purpose, newspapers were the best medium for protection and promotion of any language.

He added that in the subcontinent, greater emphasis had been given to languages such as English and Hindi. He pointed out that until 1963, there was no Sindhi chair in Karachi University, as opposed to English, Arabic and other languages. When he raised this issue, Naqi said, he was expelled from Karachi University.

Naqi also shared his experience about publishing the first Punjabi newspaper, Sajan, and said that Punjabi aristocrats or elite class did not want to promote Punjabi language as they had made huge investments in Urdu and other languages.

Talking about the challenges faced by vernacular media, he said advertisement was a major problem in promoting Punjabi among newspapers and TV channels.

Khursheed Malik, the director of programmes at Radio Pakistan, said that strong communication was possible only in the mother language, adding that radio was the common man’s medium.

“There are 23 regional languages in which Radio Pakistan broadcasts programmes daily and almost 12 hours are dedicated to regional languages,”   Malik said, adding that a language could not be promoted until it becomes a part of the curriculum. He accused the educated and affluent of playing a role in deterioration of regional languages.

Atta Rajjar said that Sindhi media was playing an important role in promoting Sindhi language. The reason for this, he explained, was that education up to masters level and all official work in Sindh was being carried out in Sindhi.

By contrast, he said that Punjab had no Punjabi language newspaper and only one television channel which airs more content in Urdu than Punjabi.

Israr Ayuab, while talking about the Pahari language, said that a language dies when people speaking that language think that it is inferior or develop a sense of inferiority. Haibtan Umar Baloch said that Balochistan had one television channel and two daily newspapers and six monthly magazines in Balochi language. However, transmissions of the channel were limited only to Karachi and some areas of Balochistan.

He added that newspapers have a limited target market which is also a hindrance for survival of Balochi newspapers. Conceding that radio addresses a large number of communities, he argued that it did not create the desired impact of promoting regional languages.

The Express Tribune

Media and the policing of society

Media and the policing of society

KARACHI: “The incidents of intolerance in society are not as important as is the response to them of the civil society,” said journalist Ghazi Salahuddin. He also laid stress on the response determining the true strength, or weakness, of a society. This was shared at a roundtable discussion held on Thursday titled ‘The role of media in promoting peace and harmony’.

Organised by the Rumi Forum, which was founded in 1999 to foster intercultural dialogue and stimulate thinking, the purpose of the discussion was to bring together opinion builders popular in mainstream Pakistani media and allow an exchange of ideas on how the media could fight for a more multicultural coexistence.

Academic and former senior analyst at Channel 24 Huma Baqai spoke about how media and national security go together.

“One such example I would like to put forth is the Sept 6 transmission on all TV channels which made me feel as if Pakistan was at war with India, or we were going to war. Almost none of those on television had the courage to come out and say that we had initiated a wrong war which put Pakistan on the path of economic decline.”

She did highlight a few examples of the print media which analysed the war more honestly and how 1965 continues to haunt the country even today. Broadcaster Wusatullah Khan asked those present that in the absence of the modern media, who else was responsible for encouraging peace and harmony in society. “Out of sheer convenience we do not hold the civil society or the establishment as responsible for the act of encouraging peace in society.”

Zulfiqar Ali Shah from Hot FM 105 took this debate forward and focused on how the radio could make contributions towards making society more pluralistic.

Uzma Alkarim, news anchor at Geo TV and also head of their gender sensitivity department, spoke about the lacking of the media in making Pakistan more tolerant.

For her it was important to not allow a skewed, stereotypical image of people on air and show more characters on television belonging to different religious minorities.

“We need to seriously calculate the impact of what is said and screened on television and also identify all those who have corrupted the screen.”

Congenital flaws in the media, coupled with a lack of professionalism and ethical standards were some of the issue raised at the discussion.

Panellists agreed that the media could shape the discourse and make the society more tolerant and harmonious with the help of civil society.

Dawn