UN Human Rights Committee calls on Pakistan to “fully implement” media safety law and guarantee that journalists can work “safely, freely and independently”

UN Human Rights Committee calls on Pakistan to “fully implement” media safety law and guarantee that journalists can work “safely, freely and independently”

The United Nations Human Rights Committee (Committee) has called on Pakistan to “fully implement” the Protection of Journalists and Media Professionals Act 2021 and “swiftly establish” the Commission mandated under the law. The Committee called on the State to guarantee that journalists and others, including human rights defenders and civil society actors, can work “safely, freely and independently” without fear of persecution, intimidation, harassment or reprisal.

In its concluding observations on Pakistan’s second periodic report on the implementation of provisions of the International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the Committee raised numerous concerns about the restrictions to free expression online and offline in Pakistan as well as the “frequent reports” of attacks on and of impunity for crimes against journalists, human rights defenders, and civil society actors.

Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF) routinely documents, investigates, and issues calls for action in response to incidents of violence, threats, and censorship of the media in Pakistan. In 2024, PPF has documented at least 117 confirmed instances of violence, intimidation, restrictive regulation, and censorship of the media. PPF has repeatedly called for the formation and effective functioning of the Commissions under the media safety laws, both federal and provincial in Sindh. 

The UN Human Rights Committee provided five steps of action for Pakistan to take to ensure compliance with Article 19 of the CCPR.

  1. Take immediate steps to ensure everyone can exercise the right to free expression online and offline without interference. The Committee said this included reviewing or repealing specific legislation, end steps that “unduly restriction” free expression, including Internet shutdowns, website, and social media platforms blocks, and establishing an “independent and effective” oversight board to review and monitor decisions regarding internet censorship. The Committee said that they should ensure that any restrictions on free expression meet the conditions of the CCPR.
  2. Abstain from adopting measures or laws that could further lead to “undue restrictions” on the right to free expression. The Committee cited some instances, including the countrywide firewall and E-Safety Authority Bill 2023. They called for the State to ensure “broad consultations” with stakeholders.
  3. The Committee called on Pakistan to “consider decriminalizing defamation” and also ensure that certain laws, including criminal, sedition, and counter-terrorism laws, are not used to silence journalists and others.
  4. Called for the investigation of all allegations of enforced disappearance, torture, killing, and intimidation of journalists and others. The Committee called for perpetrators to be brought o justice, “appropriately sanctioned,” and appropriate reparations be provided to victims.
  5. Guarantee that journalists and others, including human rights defenders and civil society actors, can work “safely, freely and independently” without fear of persecution, intimidation, harassment or reprisal.
  6. Take “all measures necessary” to support a pluralistic media and ensure that the environment for journalists is a “safe and enabling one.” The Committee called on Pakistan to ensure this by implementing the media safety law and establishing the Commission.

In concluding observations, the Human Rights Committee expressed concern about “arbitrary restrictions” on online and offline free expression. They cited Internet shutdowns, including in May 2023 during protests by the Pakistan Tehreek i Insaf party and during the general elections in February, and the closure of social media platforms.  

The Committee voiced concern about the “chilling effect” of certain laws, including defamation laws, on the free expression of different groups of individuals, including journalists. Amongst the laws cited included the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act 2016, the Removal and Blocking of Unlawful Online Content (Procedure, Oversight, and Safeguards) Rules 2021, the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Amendment) Act 2023, and the Punjab Defamation Act 2024.

According to the UN Human Rights Committee, they were concerned about reports of “increased coercion and censorship” of media outlets for criticism of the government, military, and intelligence agencies. They said this included the closure and suspension of channels’ licenses by the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA).

The Committee noted the adoption of the federal media safety law. Still, it said that it “remains concerned” about “frequent reports” of enforced disappearance, torture, killing, threats, harassment, and intimidation of journalists and others, including human rights defenders and civil society actors that were seen to be critical of the government or promoting issues considered sensitive. The Committee also noted the high level of impunity for these crimes.

————————————————————————————————————————–

Pakistan Press Foundation emphasizes immediate need to reverse course in repeated cycles of violence against journalists; draws attention to dismal implementation of media safety legislation

Pakistan Press Foundation emphasizes immediate need to reverse course in repeated cycles of violence against journalists; draws attention to dismal implementation of media safety legislation

Repeated cycles of violence and a climate of censorship plague the media in Pakistan. On the International Day to End Impunity for Crimes Against Journalists, Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF) calls on all duty bearers to act immediately to reverse course in the alarming situation for the safety of journalists and media professionals in Pakistan. It is completely unacceptable that year after year, the number of murdered journalists keeps rising and media professionals continue to face threats and acts of violence promoting fear and self censorship amongst the media. Meanwhile, the restrictive environment continues to be tightened through regulatory measures, legislation, and enforced censorship.

PPF draws immediate attention to the alarming situation for the safety of the media, the dismal progress and implementation of media safety legislation to protect journalists, and the lack of accountability in even the worst attacks on the media i.e. murders. It is unacceptable that over the years, despite changes in government and claims of support for journalists by different political parties, journalists in Pakistan continue to face direct risks for their work. 

The government and other duty bearers, including political party leadership, law enforcement agencies, and the judiciary, must commit to ending the nearly absolute impunity enjoyed by those who target journalists and ensure that instead of regressing, the landscape for media safety in Pakistan can improve. 

Physical violence, including targeted murders, and the threats to journalists, have unfortunately become the norm in Pakistan. While media professionals face dire and direct consequences in the line of duty, the perpetrators of these attacks continue to enjoy high levels of impunity, perpetuating the cycles of violence against the media.

In 2024, PPF has documented at least 117 confirmed instances of violence, intimidation, restrictive regulation, and censorship of the media, including: 

    • Two murders
    • 48 instances of assault
    • Three cases of detention
    • Seven cases of assault and detention
    • Two arrests
    • Five attacks on the property including raids
    • 13 cases of threats and harassment majority of which were online (nine)
    • One instance of remarks targeting media 
    • Five cases registered
    • Three instances of FIA action
    • Two instances of other legal action
    • Two instances of placement on Exit Control List (ECL)
    • 24 instances of censorship including legislation or policies that would affect free expression, restrictive directives or notices to media outlets, internet, and social media closures. 

Although PPF documented 13 killings or murders of journalists and media professionals between January and October 2024, at least two murders were clearly related to the journalist’s work — Khalil Jibran and Bachal Ghunio. 

It is crucial to ensure effective and conclusive investigations into the murder of journalists so that motives can be confirmed, it can be determined whether it was due to a media professional’s work, and the perpetrators can be brought to justice. 


Recommendations

To break the cycles of violence and resulting impunity, commitments must go beyond words of support through action taken at different levels, including:

  • Justice must be served to those who perpetrate violent acts against journalists in different forms, most significantly through murders and killings. Justice for these crimes is not only a matter of individual accountability but is essential to preserving the integrity of the media and the functioning of democracy. 
  • Investigations into attacks on the media must reach their logical end. The high rates of impunity in the murder of journalists are entirely unacceptable. The government and relevant authorities, including law enforcement and judiciary, must ensure that all cases of journalists’ murders are properly investigated and, where necessary, cases or investigations are reopened. Those killing incidents that are in court must have regular hearings and lead to convictions rather than the current norm of inconclusive court cases for, in some cases, decades. 
  • Forming the independent commission mandated by the law is critical to investigating and prosecuting attacks on journalists. Once established, the federal media safety commission must function as an active body that investigates all incidents of attacks on journalists. 
  • The Sindh Commission for the Protection of Journalists and Other Media Practitioners must be an actively and effectively functioning body so that incidents of violence at the provincial level can be reported, investigated, and addressed. 
  • Under both laws, the federal and Sindh governments are falling short of achieving their objectives to address impunity. The federal media safety law states that the government will implement best practices provided for in the United Nations Plan of Action on the Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity. The Sindh law states that the government will develop and implement effective strategies to combat impunity, including coordinating with stakeholders to implement best practices in the UN Plan of Action. The laws are binding, and the governments must fulfill their responsibilities.
  • The lack of media safety legislation at the provincial level in Punjab, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and Balochistan provinces in the midst of violent attacks documented against journalists in each of the provinces is reflective of a complete lack of commitment to ensuring the safety of the media. The provincial governments must introduce and pass media safety laws in their respective provinces to ensure that journalists in each province are protected under the law. 
  • Political parties must enforce a code of conduct for engaging with media professionals during rallies, protests, and other physical party-related events and online to prevent violence against journalists. Leadership must reiterate such policies and ensure that supporters do not initiate violence against the media. Inflammatory remarks by political leaders must also be condemned at a party level.
  • PPF has observed that during any period of protests or heightened political activity, journalists are caught in the crossfire and subject to attacks from protestors and police alike. Designated safe areas for journalists should be established during political protests and rallies to ensure their safety while reporting on these events. This is particularly achievable during pre scheduled protests and rallies.
  • Journalists and media professionals in the field must be respected. In 2024, in numerous instances where journalists had identified themselves as a member of the press, including via visible press cards, they still were subject to violence and arrests. This is not acceptable.
  • Following the Kenyan High Court’s ruling that declared the killing of Arshad Sharif as “unlawful,” there is a need for meaningful and conclusive court proceedings. Authorities must conduct a thorough and conclusive investigation into the killing of Sharif, including an investigation into the broader circumstances that led to his murder and reasons for his departure from Pakistan. When even the most high profile murder cases remain unresolved, there is little hope for other cases to be resolved. 
  • State imposed restrictions or forms of censorship including the closure of X, formerly Twitter, as well as disruptions in internet access, set a worrying precedent for the measures that can be implemented to restrict the space for free expression. The lack of transparency, clarity and engagement with stakeholders are alarming.
  • Shrinking spaces both online and offline are worrisome and the government must ensure that such measures are not being implemented to stifle debate, discussion and discourse. 
  • The government must take seriously and act on the concerns regarding freedom of expression and media safety raised by United Nations Human Rights Committee members during Pakistan’s state review under the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). 
  • Law enforcement agencies, including the police, must understand and protect the media’s role as a watchdog in society. This can be achieved in several ways, such as:

              – Law enforcement officials such as police must be trained at a district level across Pakistan so that they are better informed, equipped, and able to investigate and follow up on attacks on the media. 

              – District-level law enforcement must take ownership of the targeted attacks on media professionals in their area and work to address the persisting culture of impunity.

            – Registration of criminal complaints (First Information Reports) against those who attack journalists, formation of investigative teams, and conclusive investigations should be facilitated.


On June 18, journalist Khalil Jibran was brutally murdered in the Khyber district of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. Jibran, who was killed after receiving 19 bullets, had previously received threats. Khyber News Chief Editor Mubarak Ali told PPF that Jibran had frequently reported on terrorist activities in his area and had been receiving continuous threats from banned groups. Despite this, no group has claimed responsibility for the murder, and no arrests have been made. 

Jibran Khalil, son of the late journalist, also confirmed that his father had received threats prior to his death. He shared that no arrests had been made in connection to his father’s murder, adding that the family is now facing additional threats. 

Khyber Union of Journalists President Nasir Hussain told PPF he believed Khalil was murdered due to his critical reporting. So far, no one has been apprehended in relation to the crime, he shared.

In another unfortunate incident, Awaaz TV reporter Muhammad Bachal Ghunio was murdered on August 27 in the Ghotki district of Sindh province.

After Ghunio’s murder, Station House Officer and Investigation Officer Abdul Shakoor Lakho from Wasti Jeevan Shah Police Station had told PPF that he believed Ghunio was killed due to his journalism as he was living in the katcha area and kept reporting about dacoits and their facilitators. 

Awaaz TV Director of News Naz Sahito also told PPF that certain influential individuals in the district had been displeased with Ghunio’s reporting for some time. Ghunio had been receiving multiple threats, and Sahito strongly believed that his murder was directly linked to his journalistic work. 

Sahito added that the organization provides legal assistance to Ghunio’s family and has notified the Sindh Commission for the Protection of Journalists and Media Practitioners (CPJMP) who had responded by taking action and writing letters to the relevant authorities. Days after Ghunio’s murder, the main suspect had been arrested by police, Dawn reported. According to Sahito, while police have arrested several suspects, the actual perpetrators remain at large.

Ghunio’s brother Sachal Ghunio shared that one suspect, Shaukat Ghunio, had been arrested by police and was currently in custody. The case is being heard in the District and Sessions Judge Anti-Terrorism Court in Ghotki at Mirpur Mathelo.

Just a few months prior, Awami Awaz reporter Nasrullah Gadani was critically wounded in an armed attack on May 21 in Mirpur Mathelo in the Ghotki district and succumbed to injuries just days later on May 24. 

The lack of progress in cases of other journalists killed in the line of duty in Pakistan paint a dismal picture. Pakistan has been on the Committee to Protect Journalists Global Impunity Index of countries with the highest rates of impunity, since it was launched. 

The murder of journalists and media professionals for their work is the ultimate silencing tool and the worst instance of attack possible. These murders are not isolated incidents; they are part of a broader, disturbing pattern of violence targeting journalists in Pakistan. Physical violence, threats of violence, and other forms of intimidation of the media are commonplace in Pakistan. 

As with murders, the repeat occurrence of these forms of violence, intimidation, and censorship over the years is reflective of the dismal situation for media safety and the level of impunity for those who are behind such attacks, which enables the same trends to continue year after year. The situation reflects an absence of effective preventative, protective, and prosecutorial mechanisms as outlined in the UN Action Plan for the Safety of Journalists. Each attack on a journalist, whether an act of manhandling, a threatening message on social media, or a regulatory directive banning coverage, contributes to an overall culture of fear and censorship. 

A common trend observed during the past year, similar to 2023, was waves of violence against media professionals during periods of heightened political activity, including protests. 

In Karachi, ten police officers were suspended for violence against women protestors and journalists during a day of protests on October 13. Journalists were assaulted, their equipment was damaged and they were detained by police. Zulfiqar Wahucho, the General Secretary of the Karachi Press Club Cultural Committee, News One reporter Shoukat Korai, and KTN News journalists Allah Rakhyo, Altaf Channa, and Pavan Kumar were among the affected media persons.

Separately, during protests held by the opposition Pakistan Tehreek i Insaf (PTI) party in late September and early October, several journalists were assaulted and detained by police as well as attacked by protestors. The recurring mistreatment of media professionals during politically charged events highlights an alarming trend where both law enforcement and political party members have disregarded press freedom and the role that media plays in covering key developments. 

Blatant violations of the media safety law were also documented with the seizure of electronic devices of journalists. In one case, Geo News reporter Haider Shirazi was tortured by police officers while filming police actions against a protester on September 28 in Islamabad. Despite identifying himself as a journalist, Shirazi’s phone was confiscated in contravention of the Protection of Journalists and Media Professionals Act, 2021,  and he was taken to an undisclosed location.

The law states that every journalist and media professional has the right to privacy which includes protection against interference with his/her home, correspondence and family. It requires the government to ensure that no person, officer, agency or institution unlawfully or arbitrarily interferes with the right to privacy of any journalist, reporter, or media professional and his/her home, correspondence (including electronic correspondence) and family.

General elections were held in February largely without incidents of violence against the media; however, sporadic incidents were documented in the lead-up to the elections during political party rallies, and journalists faced vile campaigns, rhetoric, and harassment online, particularly women journalists and media professionals. 

The ability of journalists to report on election day was severely hampered by the closure of mobile connectivity and data services countrywide. The suspension was attributed to security concerns but stayed in place for hours after the end of polling at 5 pm. A “lack of communication” was also blamed for the delay in announcing results. Additionally, social media platform X was blocked on February 17, and over eight months later, X remains inaccessible in Pakistan without a VPN. Multiple disruptions to internet access have been documented this year amid reports of the government installing a national firewall.

Meanwhile, the broadcast regulator, the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA),  has consistently overstepped its mandate as a regulator and blocked entire areas of coverage, leaving the broadcast media unable to cover critical developments. Most recently, PEMRA issued show-cause notices to television channels for their coverage of the terrorist attack on October 6 near Karachi’s Jinnah International Airport. The media must be able to report on critical developments in the country, including incidents of violence and terror, without facing punitive measures for doing so.

There has also been an attempt to curtail physical spaces for free expression. In one such instance, district administration issued a directive to the Quetta Press Club restricting them from allowing any political party or organization to hold a press conference or seminar without prior approval or permission of district administration. This prohibition undermines the press club’s independence and autonomy. The press club must be able to operate without interference, which it has a right to do so.

In an alarming development, at the start of 2024, the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) issued notices to several dozen media professionals for allegedly participating in a campaign against the judiciary. In connection with this, journalist and YouTuber Asad Ali Toor was arrested by the FIA on February 26, when he appeared before the FIA Cyber Crime Wing in Islamabad in response to the latest of a series of notices issued to him. Despite the media safety law protecting the right to privacy, before he was eventually released on March 16, on bail, the relevant courts were informed that the journalists’ devices had been confiscated, with his lawyer adding that Toor’s mobile had been taken.

During Pakistan’s state review of the implementation of provisions of the International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) in October, it was noted that the threats to journalists, killings, and disappearance of journalists were widespread, and this was “fuelling a climate of self-censorship.” Additionally, they said that there was “near total impunity.” As per a press release issued by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the Human Rights Committee questioned what prosecutions were issued to address impunity and to guarantee remedial measures for victims and their families. They questioned how the State ensured that laws were not used unfairly to target journalists and what the appeals process was for journalists. They asked what steps had been taken to establish the commission to protect journalists’ rights. 

We urge the government to share the details and progress of the committees established to investigate violence against journalists and immediately establish the Commission required under the media safety law. The concerns raised by the UN Human Rights Committee should act as an impetus for meaningful action to reduce the violence against the media and the endemic impunity enjoyed by the perpetrators of this violence.

The International Day to End Impunity for Crimes Against Journalists serves as a disheartening reminder of the lack of safety for journalists and the continued violence and fear that the media in Pakistan has to work within. The relevant authorities must take immediate steps to reverse course rather than allowing the culture of impunity for attacks on journalists to persist, enabling the violence against journalists to continue without repercussions.

—————————————————-  ENDS   ———————————————————–

Sindh Home Minister Orders Action Against Police Over Assault on Journalists During Protests in Karachi

Sindh Home Minister Orders Action Against Police Over Assault on Journalists During Protests in Karachi

Sindh Home Minister Ziaul Hasan Lanjar announced action against police officers involved in the arrest and assault of women protesters and journalists during a day of protests in Karachi on October 13 despite a ban on public gatherings under Section 144.

An investigation into police misconduct has been initiated, with officers who assaulted journalists facing consequences. DIG South Asad Raza condemned the violent treatment, stating: “Strict action will be taken against the police officials involved in the ill-treatment.” He stressed that such behavior towards journalists, even after they identified themselves, is unacceptable.

According to ARY News, law enforcement officials have behaved violently with some journalists while dispersing protestors outside the Karachi Press Club.

The protests occurred at multiple locations — outside the Karachi Press Club, Teen Talwar, and Hotel Metropole — by some religious organizations and civil society organizations.

On October 12, the Karachi commissioner enforced a five-day ban on public gatherings from October 13 to 17, citing security concerns. The restriction, implemented on the advice of the additional inspector general (AIG), prohibited protests, sit-ins, and rallies across the city.

Waziristan Journalists Wrongly Placed on Terror Watchlist, Authorities Acknowledge Error

Three journalists from South Waziristan—Farooq Mehsud of Aaj TV and President of the Mehsud Press Club, Ishtiaq Mehsud of Mashaal Radio and former president of the club, and Aslam Mehsud of daily Ummat —were mistakenly added to Pakistan’s Fourth Schedule under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA), a list meant for individuals suspected of terrorism or anti-state activities. The listing restricted their movement and placed them under increased surveillance.

The journalists were added to the Fourth Schedule during a District Intelligence Coordination Committee (DICC) meeting on October 7, chaired by the Deputy Commissioner of South Waziristan (Upper). The meeting included representatives from civil, military, and intelligence agencies. Under Section 11 of the ATA 1997, the journalists were listed, triggering an outcry from media organizations and press freedom advocates.

The Deputy Commissioner of Waziristan admitted that the journalists’ names were “erroneously” included. He confirmed that the Home Department had been informed.

Speaking to the Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF), Farooq Mehsud expressed relief that the mistake was being corrected but remained cautious as they waited for formal action from the National Counter Terrorism Authority (NACTA) and the Home Department. The journalists highlighted how their inclusion on the list severely impacted their ability to perform their duties in an already difficult region.

The Pashtun Journalists Association (PJA) strongly condemned the wrongful listing of the journalists. “The PJA demands an immediate end to actions targeting media professionals, and the names of the Mehsud Press Club journalists must be removed from the Fourth Schedule without delay,” the association declared in its statement.

Pakistan Press Foundation Strongly Condemns Violence Against Journalists Amid Political Protests

Pakistan Press Foundation Strongly Condemns Violence Against Journalists Amid Political Protests

Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF) strongly condemned the multiple acts of violence, harassment, and detention of journalists while covering political protests by the opposition political party, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI). The recurring mistreatment of media professionals during politically charged events highlights an alarming trend where both law enforcement and political party members have disregarded press freedom and the role that media plays in covering key developments. This ongoing violation of journalists’ rights to work without intimidation or harm is unacceptable, and PPF demands that those responsible be held accountable.

PPF emphasizes that such attacks on the press are not isolated incidents but part of an ongoing pattern during politically heated protests. Similar abuses were reported in previous PTI protests and rallies. PPF urges political parties, law enforcement agencies, and relevant authorities to develop a code of conduct that safeguards media professionals during protests and rallies, ensuring their safety and the continuation of reporting. Political protestors and law enforcement must not lump journalists with protestors, as the media’s role is distinctly different and must be respected.

A wave of attacks on journalists and media professionals was documented during the recent protests at the end of September and the first week of October. Geo News reporter Haider Shirazi was tortured by police officers while filming police actions against a protester on September 28 in Islamabad. Despite identifying himself as a journalist, Shirazi’s phone was confiscated in direct contravention of the Protection of Journalists and Media Professionals Act, 2021,  and he was taken to an undisclosed location. Additionally, Sajjad Kazmi, a reporter for Such TV, and his cameraman Fakhar Hayat were beaten by police officers on October 4 while covering a PTI protest in Faizabad, Islamabad. Kazmi stated: “We kept telling them we were journalists, but they didn’t listen and continued attacking us.”

Qamar Makeen, a reporter for GTV, was also assaulted while covering a PTI protest on October 5 in Islamabad. Makeen reported that around 8 to 9 pm, while passing through the Shaheed-e-Millat area, he witnessed police officers beating a person on the ground. As he began recording, the police approached him, and despite his attempts to show his press card and identify himself as a journalist, they grabbed him by the collar, dragged him, and beat him. Makeen recalled an officer saying, “Ruk abhi teri sahafat nikaalte hain” (“Wait, we’ll deal with your journalism now”). He was only released when other officers intervened. Shaken, he sought refuge in a nearby office.

On October 4, Tahir Naseer, a senior reporter for Dawn News, and freelance cameraman Yasir Mehmood were attacked by police while covering a PTI rally at Dhok Kala Khan Bridge, Express Highway in  Islamabad. Naseer stated that the police, under the pretense of checking their press cards, snatched their wallets and attempted to seize their equipment. Despite identifying themselves as journalists, they were assaulted. Station House Officer Khanna, Irshad Cheema, slapped Naseer and ordered further shelling on them while other officers attempted to confiscate their mobile phones. Both Naseer and Mehmood narrowly escaped the attack.

Digital journalist Zeeshan Noor Chaudhry shared in a post on X that he was arrested while covering the PTI protests in Islamabad. Hasnain Rafiq, an anchor for Naya Pakistan Channel, said his home was raided. Makhdoom Shahab Uddin, Islamabad, in a post shared on X,  said he was arrested and later released.

Zahida Rao, a reporter for ABN News, reported harassment and physical restraint by male police officers during her coverage of a protest in Islamabad. Despite showing her press card, she was surrounded and forced to delete footage documenting police violence. Similarly, Allah Noor Wazir, a reporter for Mashriq TV, was beaten with sticks by police officers while covering a PTI protest in China Chowk, Islamabad, sustaining injuries to his hand and leg.

Amanat Goshkari, a crime reporter for 24 News, was fired upon with rubber bullets by police during the Islamabad protests on October 3. Goshkari had been assigned by his office to cover the protest; while he stood on the sidelines and his cameraman was capturing footage, the police began firing tear gas and bullets at the protesters, and a rubber bullet struck him, resulting in an eye injury.

Baber Malik, a reporter for ARY News, was attacked by PTI protestors on September 28 while covering events on Muree Road, Islamabad. Malik recounted how stones were thrown at him by protestors, causing minor injuries and damaging his mobile phone.

Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) and the Rawalpindi Islamabad Union of Journalists (RIUJ) have strongly condemned these escalating attacks and demanded immediate action from both the government and PTI to protect media workers. 

The RIUJ also emphasized that these violent incidents are not misunderstandings but deliberate attacks on press freedom. RIUJ officials have called for clear government policies to address whether this brutality is sanctioned or a result of local police actions.

PPF reiterates its demand that authorities hold the perpetrators accountable, initiate comprehensive investigations, and create protective mechanisms for journalists. Press freedom must be preserved so journalists can perform their duties without fear of violence or persecution.

 

PPF alarmed by PEMRA’s overreach in issuing show-cause notices to TV channels for coverage of terrorist attack in Karachi

PPF alarmed by PEMRA’s overreach in issuing show-cause notices to TV channels for coverage of terrorist attack in Karachi

Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF) is alarmed by the unacceptable overreach of the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA), which has issued show-cause notices to television channels for their coverage of the terrorist attack on October 6 near Karachi’s Jinnah International Airport. The media must be able to report on critical developments in the country, including incidents of violence and terror, without facing punitive measures for doing so.

A show-cause notice was issued on October 8 to multiple television channels following the coverage of the explosion. In it, television channels were reprimanded for airing images, footage, and live reporting from the location in their bulletins. The notice stated that broadcasters had been directed to refrain from the broadcast or rebroadcast and live coverage of “any unfortunate/unpleasant incident” such as an explosion, blast, or firing. 

In February 2023, PEMRA issued a directive following another terrorist incident in Karachi, in which the regulator prohibited television channels from covering terrorist attacks.

Reacting to the latest show-cause notices issued to multiple television channels, the Association of Electronic Media Editors and News Directors (Aemend) stated they were “illegal” and an attempt to exert pressure on media channels. 

In a statement, Aemend said that television channels constantly face announced and unannounced restrictions from PEMRA. Aemend said the show-cause notices, based on coverage of the attack, were an attempt to impose illegal censorship on television channels. 

Aemend noted that contrary to the “baseless allegations” leveled in the show-cause notice, television channels had covered the incident very responsibly, adding that no institution was above the law and if any broadcaster had violated the code of conduct, it could be looked at as per the law, but in disguise to issue all channels notices displayed malafide intentions and were unacceptable.

The Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) has also condemned the show-cause notices. In a statement, PFUJ President Afzal Butt and Secretary General Arshad Ansari said that it was a “blatant attempt to pressure and manipulate media outlets.” They called for the withdrawal of the “uncalled for and illegitimate notices.”

PPF expresses deep concern over prohibition of Quetta Press Club from holding events without district administration approval; the move undermines the independence of the press club

PPF expresses deep concern over prohibition of Quetta Press Club from holding events without district administration approval; the move undermines the independence of the press club

Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF) is deeply concerned by the directive issued to the Quetta Press Club restricting them from allowing any political party or organization to hold a press conference or seminar without prior approval or permission of district administration. This prohibition undermines the press club’s independence and autonomy. The press club must be able to operate without interference, which it has a right to do. 

The directive issued by the Office of the Deputy Commissioner Quetta on August 27 stated that “owing to the current law and order situation,” no political party or organization was allowed to organize a conference or seminar at the Quetta Press Club without the permission of the district administration. The press club was informed that no conference or seminar could be held without a non-objection certificate (NOC) or permission from the district administration.

The Balochistan Union of Journalists (BUJ) strongly condemned the directive and stated it was a “reprehensible” attempt to control the media unconstitutionally and illegally. The BUJ stated that the press club is an independent institution and is not bound to abide by the district administration’s unconstitutional directive. It added that the press club had always been mindful of its responsibilities and played the role of a bridge between the government and the people.

Speaking to PPF, Quetta Press Club General Secretary Banaras Khan said a meeting had been called to discuss the matter on August 29 with members of the Quetta Press Club, BUJ, and the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ).

In a statement, the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) took “serious exception” to the directive. In a statement, PFUJ President Afzal Butt and Secretary General Arshad Ansari said: “This is an attempt to curb free speech and press freedom in the country, and it is rejected and will not be accepted.” PFUJ called for the withdrawal of the directive and urged the administration to “desist from such ruthless practices.”

The Council of Pakistan Newspaper Editors (CPNE) rejected the directive. It cautioned that this was such an attack on free expression that it could also spread to other provinces after Balochistan. In a joint statement, CPNE President Irshad Ahmed Arif and other duty-bearers said that no such directive could be accepted that restricts the right to free expression and the Constitutional right to provide people with information.

The Karachi Press Club also condemned the directive, with President Saeed Sarbazi describing it as a “blatant attack on the fundamental principles of freedom of press and freedom of speech.”

Earlier this year, on May 18, police and local administration in Quetta locked the Quetta Press Club to reportedly stop the Balochistan Yakjehti Committee (BYC) from holding a seminar. According to the press club administration, the assistant commissioner had asked them not to permit the seminar and locked the hall and main gate.

Ignoring the locking of the gates, members of the BYC broke the lock and held their seminar.

PPF and 59 other international organizations call on the EU to act against Israeli authorities’ ‘unprecedented killings of journalists and other violations of media freedom’

Pakistan Press Foundation joined 59 other international organizations to call on the European Union (EU) to act against the “unprecedented killing of journalists and other violations of media freedom” by Israeli authorities in contravention of Israel’s human rights and international humanitarian law obligations. 

“These violations should trigger the suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement and further EU-targeted sanctions against those responsible. Regrettably, the EU 27 governments are yet to unanimously acknowledge, attribute, and condemn the Israeli forces’ crimes in Gaza,” read the letter to EU leaders.

Read the full letter below:

To:

Mr. Josep Borrell Fontelles

High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy / Vice-President of the Commission

Mr. Valdis Dombrovskis

European Commission, Executive Vice-President for An Economy that Works for People

In copy: Foreign Ministries of EU Member States

Dear High Representative / Vice-President Borrell and Executive Vice-President Dombrovskis,

Our organizations are writing to request that the European Union take action against the Israeli authorities’ unprecedented killing of journalists and other violations of media freedom, in contravention of Israel’s human rights and international humanitarian law (IHL) obligations. These are part of widespread and systematic abuses committed by Israeli authorities in Gaza, the West Bank, Israel, and elsewhere, as documented or acknowledged by Israeli, Palestinian and international NGOs, UN experts, the International Court of Justice, and in a request for arrest warrants by the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court. These violations should trigger the suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement and further EU targeted sanctions against those responsible. Regrettably, the EU 27 governments are yet to unanimously acknowledge, attribute, and condemn the Israeli forces’ crimes in Gaza.

Since October 7, 2023, when fighters led by Hamas’ armed wing carried out numerous and coordinated attacks on civilians and hostage-taking in Israel, the Netanyahu administration has taken an unprecedented series of steps to curtail media freedom that has effectively resulted in the establishment of a censorship regime.

The ongoing attacks against journalists and media freedom by Israeli authorities requiring urgent action include:

Unprecedented killings of journalists: Press freedom organizations, including the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), Reporters Without Borders (RSF), and the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) have recorded the killings of more than 100 Palestinian journalists and media workers  in Gaza, as well as two Israeli and three Lebanese journalists, since October 7, making it the deadliest period for journalists in the decades that these organizations have been gathering data. Many of these journalists were wearing press insignia when killed. The decimation and displacement of Gaza’s press corps has meant that fewer local journalists are left to report on the hostilities in Gaza.

Targeted killings of journalists: CPJ found that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) directly targeted and killed at least five journalists1, and CPJ is researching at least 10 other deaths that indicate possible IDF targeting2. Other organizations such as RSF believe the number of targeted killings may be higher. Documenting and verifying the details necessary to conclude that targeting has occurred, while access to Gaza is constrained and reporting conditions remain dire, is difficult. The targeted or indiscriminate killing of journalists, if committed deliberately or recklessly, is a war crime. In one of these attacks, an IDF tank strike killed Reuters journalist Issam Abdallah in southern Lebanon on October 13, as documented by extensive independent investigations by human rights and media organizations and supported by extensive forensic video analysis.3

Ban on independent media access to Gaza: While some restrictions on reporting are common in war, the effective total ban on journalists entering Gaza — both foreign nationals and Israeli and Palestinian journalists — is unprecedented in modern times. Journalists have been able to report from the frontlines in almost every major conflict over the past three decades: from Ukraine to Rwanda. By comparison, despite the Israeli government press office issuing media credentials to approximately 2,800 international journalists to enter Israel since the conflict began, only select journalists have been allowed to enter the Gaza Strip — all under Israeli military escort and with restrictions on reporting.4 Consequently, more than 70 news outlets and civil society organizations have recently urged that Israel grant independent access to Gaza.

Record-high arbitrary detention: Since October 7, Israel has arrested at least 49 journalists and media workers — often without charge — in what they and their attorneys say is retaliation for their journalism and commentary. At least 13 are being held under administrative detention, a policy under which a military commander may detain an individual without charge, typically for six months, on the grounds of preventing them from committing a future offense, and extended an unlimited number of times. The use of the procedure has repeatedly been declared a form of arbitrary detention by the UN.

Enforced disappearance: Palestinian journalists Nidal Al-Wahidi and Haitham Abdelwahid have been detained by Israeli authorities since October 7, while they were reporting on the Hamas-led attack in southern Israel. Since then, the Israeli authorities have refused to disclose information about their whereabouts, the legal grounds for their arrest, or even confirmation that they are still alive.

Allegations of torture and mistreatment: There are a growing number of allegations by journalists of torture and mistreatment while arrested or detained by Israeli authorities. While lack of access to Gaza has hampered research organizations’ ability to independently confirm these accounts, they are consistent with the evidence of systemic ill-treatment of detainees in Israeli custody documented by civil society organizations and the United Nations.

Censorship and egregious limitations of media freedom: More broadly, legal impediments and significant impairments to independent reporting within Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory have expanded since October 7. In Israel, press freedom has been curtailed by an increasing number of banned articles, government officials’ anti-press rhetoric, alleged attempts to seemingly control news outlets, and attacks on Israeli reporters, among other threats. In April 2024, Israel also passed a law that empowers the government to temporarily ban the broadcasting of international news outlets in Israel if they are deemed a threat to national security, resulting in the shuttering of Al Jazeera within Israel. In May 2024, Israel temporarily confiscated equipment from the Associated Press for providing live video feeds to Al Jazeera. There are also ongoing internet shutdowns that prevent news and testimonies from Gaza from reaching the outside world, extensive allegations of harassment and intimidation, and reports that more than 50 media offices have been destroyed or damaged in Gaza.

Failure to investigate or hold perpetrators to account: Despite repeated calls by civil society organizations, none of these attacks, killings, or other allegations of abuse against journalists have been transparently or comprehensively investigated by the IDF. The IDF has a longstanding pattern of impunity that predates the current conflict: in May 2023, CPJ documented at least 20 journalists killed by the IDF over the past 22 years, including American-Palestinian journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, and no one had ever been charged or held accountable for their deaths. The Israeli rights groups B’Tselem and Yesh Din have independently concluded that when Israeli military investigations do occur, they serve as a “whitewash mechanism,” findings that are supported by other organizations such as Human Rights Watch.

Journalists play an indispensable role in documenting and reporting on war crimes and other human rights violations. The cumulative effect of these abuses is to create the conditions for an information void, as well as for propaganda and mis- and disinformation. While Israel contends that its actions are to keep its people safe, history shows that censorship and denial of the right to information is a flawed path to peace or security.

We, therefore, write to you today to call for the suspension of the Israel / EU Association Agreement on the basis that it has violated international human rights and criminal law and for the adoption of targeted sanctions against IDF officials and others responsible.

In addition, European leaders should unequivocally and publicly ask that Israel meet the following demands on press freedom:

Provide access and uphold the freedom to report 

  • Lift its blockade on international, Israeli, and Palestinian journalists from independently accessing Gaza.
  • Revoke legislation permitting the government to shut down foreign outlets and refrain from any further legal or regulatory curtailment of media operations.
  • Release all Palestinian journalists from administrative detention or who are otherwise held without charge.

Protect the lives of journalists 

  • Abjure the indiscriminate and deliberate killing of journalists.
  • Guarantee the safety of all journalists, including allowing the delivery of newsgathering equipment and safety gear to reporters in Gaza and the West Bank.
  • Allow all journalists seeking to evacuate from Gaza to do so.

Ensure accountability and end impunity 

  • Transparently reform its investigation procedures to ensure that all investigations into alleged war crimes, criminal conduct, or violations of human rights are swift, thorough, effective, transparent, independent, and in line with internationally accepted practices. Investigations into abuses against journalists must then be promptly conducted in accordance with these procedures.
  • Allow international investigators and human rights organizations, including United Nations (UN) special rapporteurs, investigators for the International Criminal Court, and the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory and Israel, unrestricted access to Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory to investigate suspected violations of international law by all parties.

Thank you for the consideration of our requests.

Signed: 

  1. Association of European Journalists (AEJ-Bulgaria)
  2. Association of Journalists of Albania (AJA, Albania)
  3. Association of Polish Journalists (SDP, Poland)
  4. Association of Professional Journalists of Albania (APJA, Albania)
  5. BH Journalists Association (BHJA, Bosnia and Herzegovina)
  6. Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS)
  7. CFDT-Journalistes (France)
  8. Committee to Protect Journalists
  9. Community Media Forum Europe
  10. Croatian Journalists’ Association (CJA, Croatia)
  11. Danish Union of Journalists (DJ, Denmark)
  12. (The) Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation
  13. DISK Press Labour Union (DİSK Basın-İş, Turkey)
  14. Dutch Association of Journalists (NVJ, The Netherlands)
  15. Estonian Association of Journalists
  16. Ethical Journalism Network (EJN)
  17. EuroMed Rights
  18. European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
  19. European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
  20. Federation of Associations of Journalists of Spain (Federación de Asociaciones de Periodistas de España, FAPE, Spain)
  21. Free Press Unlimited (FPU)
  22. General Association of Professional Journalists in Belgium (AGJPB/AVBB, Belgium)
  23. Human Rights Watch (HRW)
  24. Hungarian Press Union (HPU, Hungary)
  25. IFEX
  26. Independent Journalists’ Association of Serbia (NUNS, Serbia)
  27. Independent Trade Union of Journalists and Media Workers (SSNM, North Macedonia)
  28. Index on Censorship
  29. Institute of Maltese Journalists (IGM)
  30. International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)
  31. International Media Support (IMS)
  32. International Press Institute (IPI)
  33. Journalists’ Union of Athens Daily Newspapers (JUADN, Greece)
  34. Journalists’ Union of Turkey (Türkiye Gazeteciler Sendikası, TGS, Turkey)
  35. Luxembourg Association of Professional Journalists (Association luxembourgeoise des journalistes professionnels, ALJP, Luxembourg)
  36. Media Diversity Institute
  37. National Federation of the Italian Press (Federazione Nazionale della Stampa Italiana, FNSI, Italy)
  38. National Union of Journalists – General Confederation of Labor (Syndicat National des Journalistes – Confédération Générale du Travail, SNJ-CGT, France)
  39. National Union of Journalists of Ukraine
  40. Norwegian Union of Journalists (Norsk Journalistlag, Norway)
  41. OBC Transeuropa (OBCT)
  42.  Ossigeno.info
  43. Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF)
  44. Periodical & Electronic Press Union (PEPU, Greece)
  45. Portuguese Union of Journalists (SinJor)
  46. Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
  47. Rory Peck Trust
  48. Serbian Journalists’ Union (Sinos, Serbia)
  49. Slovenian Association of Journalists (Društvo Novinarjev Slovenije, DNS, Slovenia)
  50. Slovenian Union of Journalists (SNS, Slovenia)
  51. South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)
  52. Spanish Federation of Journalists’ Unions (Federación de Sindicatos de Periodistas, FeSP, Spain)
  53. Swedish Union of Journalists (Sweden)
  54. Trade Union for Culture, Art and Media (UGS-Nezavisnost, Serbia)
  55. Trade Union of Croatian Journalists (TUCJ, Croatia)
  56. Trade Union of Media of Montenegro (TUMM, Montenegro)
  57. Turkish Journalists’ Association (Gazeteciler Cemiyeti Dernegi, GCD, Turkey)
  58. Union of Bulgarian Journalists (SBJ, Bulgaria)
  59. Union of Journalists in Finland (Suomen Journalistiliitto, Finland)
  60. Union of Journalists of Andalusia (SPA-FeSP, Spain)

1 ↩The five journalists targeted and killed are Reuters journalist and Lebanese national Issam Abdallah in southern Lebanon and Palestinian journalists Hamza Al Dahdouh, Mustafa Thuraya, Ismail Al Ghoul, and Rami Al Refee in Gaza. CPJ also found that the IDF deliberately targeted journalists before Oct. 7, as in the case of American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, whose killing is the subject of an ongoing Justice Department investigation. See CPJ report finds no accountability for journalists killed by the Israeli military over the past two decades, Committee to Protect Journalists (May 9, 2023).

2↩Other organizations such as RSF believe the number of targeted killings may be higher; however, documenting and verifying the details necessary to conclude that targeting has occurred, while access to Gaza is constrained and reporting conditions remain dire, is difficult.

3↩See independent investigations by Reuters, AFP, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and Reporters Without Borders.

4↩A small number of journalists have entered Gaza whilst embedded with the Israeli military on very short visits that offer a limited and curated view of the conflict, and a CNN correspondent briefly reported from inside Gaza after entering with an Emirati aid group. See Patrick Kingsley, A Glimpse Inside A Devastated Gaza, New York Times (Jan. 9, 2024). The ban on journalists’ access has been upheld by Israel’s Supreme Court. Access from Egypt is also impossible.

PPF and 59 other international organizations call on the EU to act against Israeli authorities’ ‘unprecedented killings of journalists and other violations of media freedom’

Pakistan Press Foundation joined 59 other international organizations to call on the European Union (EU) to act against the “unprecedented killing of journalists and other violations of media freedom” by Israeli authorities in contravention of Israel’s human rights and international humanitarian law obligations. 

“These violations should trigger the suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement and further EU-targeted sanctions against those responsible. Regrettably, the EU 27 governments are yet to unanimously acknowledge, attribute, and condemn the Israeli forces’ crimes in Gaza,” read the letter to EU leaders.

Read the full letter below:

To:

Mr. Josep Borrell Fontelles

High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy / Vice-President of the Commission

Mr. Valdis Dombrovskis

European Commission, Executive Vice-President for An Economy that Works for People

In copy: Foreign Ministries of EU Member States

Dear High Representative / Vice-President Borrell and Executive Vice-President Dombrovskis,

Our organizations are writing to request that the European Union take action against the Israeli authorities’ unprecedented killing of journalists and other violations of media freedom, in contravention of Israel’s human rights and international humanitarian law (IHL) obligations. These are part of widespread and systematic abuses committed by Israeli authorities in Gaza, the West Bank, Israel, and elsewhere, as documented or acknowledged by Israeli, Palestinian and international NGOs, UN experts, the International Court of Justice, and in a request for arrest warrants by the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court. These violations should trigger the suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement and further EU targeted sanctions against those responsible. Regrettably, the EU 27 governments are yet to unanimously acknowledge, attribute, and condemn the Israeli forces’ crimes in Gaza.

Since October 7, 2023, when fighters led by Hamas’ armed wing carried out numerous and coordinated attacks on civilians and hostage-taking in Israel, the Netanyahu administration has taken an unprecedented series of steps to curtail media freedom that has effectively resulted in the establishment of a censorship regime.

The ongoing attacks against journalists and media freedom by Israeli authorities requiring urgent action include:

Unprecedented killings of journalists: Press freedom organizations, including the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), Reporters Without Borders (RSF), and the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) have recorded the killings of more than 100 Palestinian journalists and media workers  in Gaza, as well as two Israeli and three Lebanese journalists, since October 7, making it the deadliest period for journalists in the decades that these organizations have been gathering data. Many of these journalists were wearing press insignia when killed. The decimation and displacement of Gaza’s press corps has meant that fewer local journalists are left to report on the hostilities in Gaza.

Targeted killings of journalists: CPJ found that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) directly targeted and killed at least five journalists1, and CPJ is researching at least 10 other deaths that indicate possible IDF targeting2. Other organizations such as RSF believe the number of targeted killings may be higher. Documenting and verifying the details necessary to conclude that targeting has occurred, while access to Gaza is constrained and reporting conditions remain dire, is difficult. The targeted or indiscriminate killing of journalists, if committed deliberately or recklessly, is a war crime. In one of these attacks, an IDF tank strike killed Reuters journalist Issam Abdallah in southern Lebanon on October 13, as documented by extensive independent investigations by human rights and media organizations and supported by extensive forensic video analysis.3

Ban on independent media access to Gaza: While some restrictions on reporting are common in war, the effective total ban on journalists entering Gaza — both foreign nationals and Israeli and Palestinian journalists — is unprecedented in modern times. Journalists have been able to report from the frontlines in almost every major conflict over the past three decades: from Ukraine to Rwanda. By comparison, despite the Israeli government press office issuing media credentials to approximately 2,800 international journalists to enter Israel since the conflict began, only select journalists have been allowed to enter the Gaza Strip — all under Israeli military escort and with restrictions on reporting.4 Consequently, more than 70 news outlets and civil society organizations have recently urged that Israel grant independent access to Gaza.

Record-high arbitrary detention: Since October 7, Israel has arrested at least 49 journalists and media workers — often without charge — in what they and their attorneys say is retaliation for their journalism and commentary. At least 13 are being held under administrative detention, a policy under which a military commander may detain an individual without charge, typically for six months, on the grounds of preventing them from committing a future offense, and extended an unlimited number of times. The use of the procedure has repeatedly been declared a form of arbitrary detention by the UN.

Enforced disappearance: Palestinian journalists Nidal Al-Wahidi and Haitham Abdelwahid have been detained by Israeli authorities since October 7, while they were reporting on the Hamas-led attack in southern Israel. Since then, the Israeli authorities have refused to disclose information about their whereabouts, the legal grounds for their arrest, or even confirmation that they are still alive.

Allegations of torture and mistreatment: There are a growing number of allegations by journalists of torture and mistreatment while arrested or detained by Israeli authorities. While lack of access to Gaza has hampered research organizations’ ability to independently confirm these accounts, they are consistent with the evidence of systemic ill-treatment of detainees in Israeli custody documented by civil society organizations and the United Nations.

Censorship and egregious limitations of media freedom: More broadly, legal impediments and significant impairments to independent reporting within Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory have expanded since October 7. In Israel, press freedom has been curtailed by an increasing number of banned articles, government officials’ anti-press rhetoric, alleged attempts to seemingly control news outlets, and attacks on Israeli reporters, among other threats. In April 2024, Israel also passed a law that empowers the government to temporarily ban the broadcasting of international news outlets in Israel if they are deemed a threat to national security, resulting in the shuttering of Al Jazeera within Israel. In May 2024, Israel temporarily confiscated equipment from the Associated Press for providing live video feeds to Al Jazeera. There are also ongoing internet shutdowns that prevent news and testimonies from Gaza from reaching the outside world, extensive allegations of harassment and intimidation, and reports that more than 50 media offices have been destroyed or damaged in Gaza.

Failure to investigate or hold perpetrators to account: Despite repeated calls by civil society organizations, none of these attacks, killings, or other allegations of abuse against journalists have been transparently or comprehensively investigated by the IDF. The IDF has a longstanding pattern of impunity that predates the current conflict: in May 2023, CPJ documented at least 20 journalists killed by the IDF over the past 22 years, including American-Palestinian journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, and no one had ever been charged or held accountable for their deaths. The Israeli rights groups B’Tselem and Yesh Din have independently concluded that when Israeli military investigations do occur, they serve as a “whitewash mechanism,” findings that are supported by other organizations such as Human Rights Watch.

Journalists play an indispensable role in documenting and reporting on war crimes and other human rights violations. The cumulative effect of these abuses is to create the conditions for an information void, as well as for propaganda and mis- and disinformation. While Israel contends that its actions are to keep its people safe, history shows that censorship and denial of the right to information is a flawed path to peace or security.

We, therefore, write to you today to call for the suspension of the Israel / EU Association Agreement on the basis that it has violated international human rights and criminal law and for the adoption of targeted sanctions against IDF officials and others responsible.

In addition, European leaders should unequivocally and publicly ask that Israel meet the following demands on press freedom:

Provide access and uphold the freedom to report 

  • Lift its blockade on international, Israeli, and Palestinian journalists from independently accessing Gaza.
  • Revoke legislation permitting the government to shut down foreign outlets and refrain from any further legal or regulatory curtailment of media operations.
  • Release all Palestinian journalists from administrative detention or who are otherwise held without charge.

Protect the lives of journalists 

  • Abjure the indiscriminate and deliberate killing of journalists.
  • Guarantee the safety of all journalists, including allowing the delivery of newsgathering equipment and safety gear to reporters in Gaza and the West Bank.
  • Allow all journalists seeking to evacuate from Gaza to do so.

Ensure accountability and end impunity 

  • Transparently reform its investigation procedures to ensure that all investigations into alleged war crimes, criminal conduct, or violations of human rights are swift, thorough, effective, transparent, independent, and in line with internationally accepted practices. Investigations into abuses against journalists must then be promptly conducted in accordance with these procedures.
  • Allow international investigators and human rights organizations, including United Nations (UN) special rapporteurs, investigators for the International Criminal Court, and the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory and Israel, unrestricted access to Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory to investigate suspected violations of international law by all parties.

Thank you for the consideration of our requests.

Signed: 

  1. Association of European Journalists (AEJ-Bulgaria)
  2. Association of Journalists of Albania (AJA, Albania)
  3. Association of Polish Journalists (SDP, Poland)
  4. Association of Professional Journalists of Albania (APJA, Albania)
  5. BH Journalists Association (BHJA, Bosnia and Herzegovina)
  6. Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS)
  7. CFDT-Journalistes (France)
  8. Committee to Protect Journalists
  9. Community Media Forum Europe
  10. Croatian Journalists’ Association (CJA, Croatia)
  11. Danish Union of Journalists (DJ, Denmark)
  12. (The) Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation
  13. DISK Press Labour Union (DİSK Basın-İş, Turkey)
  14. Dutch Association of Journalists (NVJ, The Netherlands)
  15. Estonian Association of Journalists
  16. Ethical Journalism Network (EJN)
  17. EuroMed Rights
  18. European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
  19. European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
  20. Federation of Associations of Journalists of Spain (Federación de Asociaciones de Periodistas de España, FAPE, Spain)
  21. Free Press Unlimited (FPU)
  22. General Association of Professional Journalists in Belgium (AGJPB/AVBB, Belgium)
  23. Human Rights Watch (HRW)
  24. Hungarian Press Union (HPU, Hungary)
  25. IFEX
  26. Independent Journalists’ Association of Serbia (NUNS, Serbia)
  27. Independent Trade Union of Journalists and Media Workers (SSNM, North Macedonia)
  28. Index on Censorship
  29. Institute of Maltese Journalists (IGM)
  30. International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)
  31. International Media Support (IMS)
  32. International Press Institute (IPI)
  33. Journalists’ Union of Athens Daily Newspapers (JUADN, Greece)
  34. Journalists’ Union of Turkey (Türkiye Gazeteciler Sendikası, TGS, Turkey)
  35. Luxembourg Association of Professional Journalists (Association luxembourgeoise des journalistes professionnels, ALJP, Luxembourg)
  36. Media Diversity Institute
  37. National Federation of the Italian Press (Federazione Nazionale della Stampa Italiana, FNSI, Italy)
  38. National Union of Journalists – General Confederation of Labor (Syndicat National des Journalistes – Confédération Générale du Travail, SNJ-CGT, France)
  39. National Union of Journalists of Ukraine
  40. Norwegian Union of Journalists (Norsk Journalistlag, Norway)
  41. OBC Transeuropa (OBCT)
  42.  Ossigeno.info
  43. Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF)
  44. Periodical & Electronic Press Union (PEPU, Greece)
  45. Portuguese Union of Journalists (SinJor)
  46. Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
  47. Rory Peck Trust
  48. Serbian Journalists’ Union (Sinos, Serbia)
  49. Slovenian Association of Journalists (Društvo Novinarjev Slovenije, DNS, Slovenia)
  50. Slovenian Union of Journalists (SNS, Slovenia)
  51. South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)
  52. Spanish Federation of Journalists’ Unions (Federación de Sindicatos de Periodistas, FeSP, Spain)
  53. Swedish Union of Journalists (Sweden)
  54. Trade Union for Culture, Art and Media (UGS-Nezavisnost, Serbia)
  55. Trade Union of Croatian Journalists (TUCJ, Croatia)
  56. Trade Union of Media of Montenegro (TUMM, Montenegro)
  57. Turkish Journalists’ Association (Gazeteciler Cemiyeti Dernegi, GCD, Turkey)
  58. Union of Bulgarian Journalists (SBJ, Bulgaria)
  59. Union of Journalists in Finland (Suomen Journalistiliitto, Finland)
  60. Union of Journalists of Andalusia (SPA-FeSP, Spain)

1 ↩The five journalists targeted and killed are Reuters journalist and Lebanese national Issam Abdallah in southern Lebanon and Palestinian journalists Hamza Al Dahdouh, Mustafa Thuraya, Ismail Al Ghoul, and Rami Al Refee in Gaza. CPJ also found that the IDF deliberately targeted journalists before Oct. 7, as in the case of American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, whose killing is the subject of an ongoing Justice Department investigation. See CPJ report finds no accountability for journalists killed by the Israeli military over the past two decades, Committee to Protect Journalists (May 9, 2023).

2↩Other organizations such as RSF believe the number of targeted killings may be higher; however, documenting and verifying the details necessary to conclude that targeting has occurred, while access to Gaza is constrained and reporting conditions remain dire, is difficult.

3↩See independent investigations by Reuters, AFP, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and Reporters Without Borders.

4↩A small number of journalists have entered Gaza whilst embedded with the Israeli military on very short visits that offer a limited and curated view of the conflict, and a CNN correspondent briefly reported from inside Gaza after entering with an Emirati aid group. See Patrick Kingsley, A Glimpse Inside A Devastated Gaza, New York Times (Jan. 9, 2024). The ban on journalists’ access has been upheld by Israel’s Supreme Court. Access from Egypt is also impossible.