{"id":971,"date":"2013-01-21T12:36:39","date_gmt":"2013-01-21T07:36:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pakistanfoemonitor.org\/?p=971"},"modified":"2013-01-21T12:39:26","modified_gmt":"2013-01-21T07:39:26","slug":"defamation-supreme-court-registrar-files-damages-suit-against-journalist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pakistanfoemonitor.org\/defamation-supreme-court-registrar-files-damages-suit-against-journalist\/","title":{"rendered":"Defamation: Supreme Court registrar files damages suit against journalist"},"content":{"rendered":"

Dr Faqir Hussain claims Rs 300 million in damages from Najam Sethi for publishing a \u2018defamatory\u2019 news story in a weekly magazine against him<\/p>\n

By: Hasnaat Malik<\/p>\n

ISLAMABAD: Supreme Court\u2019s Register Dr Faqir Hussain has filed an Rs 300-million damages suit in the Islamabad District Court against senior journalist Najam Sethi for publishing a news story in his weekly magazine against him.<\/p>\n

The SC registrar on Saturday filed a suit under the Defamation Ordinance 2002 through his counsel Mian Gul Hassan Aurangzeb against Najam Sethi and his publication The Friday Times. He requested the court that the suit may be decreed with costs. He also pleaded that Sethi should be permanently restrained from writing and publishing any defamatory material against him and should be directed to withdraw the \u201cdefamatory article against the SC Registrar\u201d.<\/p>\n

On September 24, 2012, the plaintiff (Dr Hussain) was informed about a story published about him in The Friday Times of August 17-23, 2012. The plaintiff read the said story on the same day, which was titled \u201cTip of the iceberg\u201d, under a general heading \u201cSuch Gup\u201d (hereinafter referred to as the \u201cdefamatory story\u201d). The story, which has offended the SC registrar, reads: \u201cThe Tony affair is just the tip of the iceberg, we hear. The contagion seems to have spread to other officials associated with the hallowed halls of justice. It is rumoured that the gent who\u2019s supposed to register all and sundry has also been the recipient of the Town Tycoon\u2019s largesse to the tune of two houses.\u201d<\/p>\n

The SC registrar contended that the story is suggestive of him being the recipient of two houses from the \u201cTown Tycoon\u201d, which is an obvious reference to the former Bahria Town chairman, Malik Riaz Hussain. The use of the word \u201ccontagion\u201d, which means \u201cspreading of disease by contact; corrupting influence\u201d, in the story is suggestive of the plaintiff, (on account of holding the office of Registrar of the Supreme Court of Pakistan), being involved in some sort of corruption by receiving two houses from the \u201cTown Tycoon\u201d.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt does not require much imagination for any reasonable person to gather the basic and fundamental intent of the defamatory story i.e. to defame, damage and traduce the plaintiff, to tarnish his high stature, and to lower him in the estimation of all those who have read the defamatory story. The allegations and accusations made in the defamatory story against the Plaintiff are libelous and defamatory, and, therefore, an actionable wrong,\u201d the SC registrar has contented.<\/p>\n

The counsel also submitted that the plaintiff had purchased two eight marla houses in Bahria Town, Islamabad. One house was purchased by the plaintiff, in the name of his son, for valuable consideration in the open market from an allottee, and the other was purchased from Bahria Town at the market rates. The lawsuit contends that the SC registrar\u2019s ownership of these houses is not the consequence of any \u201clargesse\u201d, \u201cas wrongfully, rather maliciously alleged in the defamatory story\u201d. \u201cThe bare perusal of the defamatory story shows the bias and venom the defendants have against the plaintiff.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThe false and baseless aspersions cast on the plaintiff in the defamatory story render the defendant, jointly and severally, liable to pay damages to the plaintiff and furthermore obligated them to retract and withdraw the false insinuations.\u201d Dr Hussain has also contended that the text and spirit of the \u201cmalicious and defamatory\u201d story indicates the defendants\u2019 sinister objective to cause a loss and disrepute to the plaintiff.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe remarks made by the defendants in the defamatory story about the plaintiff are baseless and made with the intention to defame the plaintiff who has already suffered in its reputation and has been lowered in the estimation of all those who have read the defamatory story.\u201d<\/p>\n

Pakistan Press Foundation<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dr Faqir Hussain claims Rs 300 million in damages from Najam Sethi for publishing a \u2018defamatory\u2019 news story in a weekly magazine against him By: Hasnaat Malik ISLAMABAD: Supreme Court\u2019s Register Dr Faqir Hussain has filed an Rs 300-million damages suit in the Islamabad District Court against senior journalist Najam Sethi for publishing a news … <\/p>\n