Ministry of IT – Pakistan Freedom of Expression Monitor http://pakistanfoemonitor.org News with beliefs, thoughts, ideas, and emotions Mon, 03 Feb 2014 12:19:24 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.6 216189435 A pointless ban http://pakistanfoemonitor.org/a-pointless-ban/ Mon, 03 Feb 2014 12:19:24 +0000 http://www.pakistanpressfoundation.org/?p=75096 It has been a year and a half since the previous government decided to block YouTube, and the new government upon their arrival, issued a statement that the matter would be looked into, which is basically just another way of displaying their indifference and lack of knowledge on the issue. Internet censorship by the PTA […]]]>

It has been a year and a half since the previous government decided to block YouTube, and the new government upon their arrival, issued a statement that the matter would be looked into, which is basically just another way of displaying their indifference and lack of knowledge on the issue. Internet censorship by the PTA is nothing new, however, this past year and a half has revealed their over-zealous and self-righteous side, considering that they feel themselves to be the guardians of morality in society. We all know how it started. A senseless video was made, which sparked protests all over the Muslim world, and gave license to the government to block any websites they felt were ‘wrong’. Not much trouble was taken to actually attempt to define this abstract concept.

YouTube is a vast database of videos that encompass virtually all areas of human knowledge and entertainment, and it is believed that out of 20 million internet users in Pakistan, at least 7 million relied on this website for something or the other. The Pakistan Telecommunication Act of 1996 banned transmission of messages that were deemed “false, fabricated, indecent or obscene”. The PTA uses this act to block any content that might or might not be inappropriate, with no specific criteria outlined. In the case of YouTube, the government is demanding that Google should implement nationwide restrictions on what is sees as ‘blasphemous’ material, so that blocking the entire website is not necessary. Google is reluctant to do this, because as a private corporation they do not see the legal environment of Pakistan to be conducive to running a business, nor will they be catering to a wide enough market to be sufficiently interested in making an effort.

Needless to say, the state holds the responsibility of the provision of rights to its citizens, and this responsibility cannot be shunted off to a private enterprise. In the case lodged against the government by various NGOs working for Internet freedom, the Ministry of IT and Telecom has not shown sufficient interest. The new Minister, Anusha Rahman has not shown up to any of the hearings, nor is she likely to do so. Unfortunately, no progress is being made. Those that are hoping that the regime will see sense should face reality. The PML-N does not see the provision of internet freedoms as a priority. And YouTube is unlikely to be accessible anywhere in the near future.

The Nation

]]>
2907
YouTube case referred to LHC CJ for larger bench http://pakistanfoemonitor.org/youtube-case-referred-to-lhc-cj-for-larger-bench/ Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:32:08 +0000 http://pakistanfoemonitor.org/?p=2149 Continue reading "YouTube case referred to LHC CJ for larger bench"

]]>
LAHORE: A judge dealing with the petition challenging ban on YouTube on Thursday referred the matter to Lahore High Court chief justice Umar Ata Bandial with recommendations to constitute a full bench to hear this matter.

The court during previous hearings had remarked that it was important to understand the nature of the problem. In today’s digital age, the court had observed, information on the Internet could not be blocked, it could be intelligently regulated. There were no borders or walls that could limit this information from flowing into Pakistan unless of course we shut down Internet completely and severed our links with the outside world.

It appears that a sustainable answer to the problem was self regulation at the individual and house-hold level. World Wide Web has all sorts of information ranging from ‘very useful’ to ‘out right offensive’.

The choice is ours, we can either draw upon the useful information for our national development or fall prey to the negative content and immerse ourselves into moral and cultural chaos, the judge said, adding that the choice was ours. He said that, in the end, the responsibility and the choice was of the individual to watch or not watch a controversial website as the same could not be effectively blocked according to the level of technology present in our country today.

The court was hearing the petition filed by an NGO. The petitioner submitted that any filtering and blocking on internet was counter productive and predatory.

The petitioner sought directions for the Ministry of IT and the PTA to reopen the functioning of YouTube. He said taking away YouTube’s access was the modern equivalent of taking away the scholar’s pen.

He appealed to the court to order the restoration of access to the YouTube in Pakistan.

The News

]]>
2149